Saturday, October 08, 2005

Buridan and portfolio management


From one of those interesting search chains, Buridan's Ass came to our attention. Buridan's Ass refers to a paradox based on the impossibility of choosing between two equally appealing alternatives. The research theme was portfolio management and the process for prioritisation and selection.

For making a choice within a project, for instance between two packages, there are some well established evaluation techniques such as Kempner Tregoe. These depend on evaluation criteria than can be compared across alternatives - cost, performance, functionality, user acceptability, regulatory compliance, etc.
Portfolio selections frequently don't have such easy measures for comparison which is why clarity of portfolio goals is so important. This is where tying in to corporate goals is crucial and strategies such as balanced score card help to integrate performance goals with portfolio decision making. This paper gives some interesting descriptions and refrerences in this area.
Decision Model based on Balanced Score Card

Labels: , , , ,

1 Comments:

At 10:56 AM, Blogger Jerry Manas said...

Graham, this is such a great post. I've seen so many "Buridan's Ass" situations it's amazing.

Here's another great site on decision-making that offers suggestions for solving the "Buridan's Ass" sitation. It's very much along the same lines of using checklist criteria (which I typically resort to).

http://www.usm.edu/counseling/selfhelpresources/decisionmaking.html

Of course, if all else ends up being equal, even after adding weighting criteria, then the best thing is to just go with one (maybe after allowing a set amount of time to sleep on it - maybe a few days).

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Return to PMThink! Project Management Gateway