Project Management Opportunity to Differentiate

Tata shares results of IT project performance survey and the results aren't flattering for the info tech profession. This consistent trend of non-performance offers companies that perform well to differentiate from the pack --- and, maybe, even achieve a sustainable competitive advantage. ...

... "Yet despite these worrying levels of failure to deliver, 43% of organisations say that their business managers and the Board accept problems as the norm. This attitude is especially common in Europe (44%) and AsiaPac (48%). Despite the general poor performance of IT projects globally, such results do not evoke a sharp reaction from management. " ...

IT Project Underperformance is the Norm

Common Causes of Out of Control Projects

List of key indicators of project failure ... some require constant monitoring. ...

... "Many times, project schedules spiral out of control when dates and deliverables aren't aggressively monitored and tracked on a daily basis. " ...

Via TechRepublic: Root Causes for Out of Control Projects

Results Project Failure Poll

Communications, resource planning, and scheduling were identified as top root causes of project failures in CompTIA poll. ...

... "Nearly 28 percent of the more than 1,000 respondents to the web poll singled out poor communications as the number one cause of project failure. Insufficient resource planning was the second most mentioned cause of project failure, cited by just less than 18 percent of poll respondents. The third most frequent cause of project failure, according to the CompTIA web poll, was an unrealistic schedule, chosen by 13.2 percent of poll participants. " ...

Via CompTIA: Project Failure - Root Cause Poll ...

Executive Support

Continuing the series of posts on Critical Success Factors, we get to Executive Support. This topic is easy to understand. It's also easy for people charged with establishing a PMO to blame lack of executive support for problems they encounter. The fact is that the kind of executive you would want as a sponsor is high enough in the organisation that they will be too busy to give detailed support. So it is essential to have a common description of the relative roles of the change management team and the executive sponsor.

Some commonly quoted expectations for executive support are:
- Visible enthusiasm within the organisation for Project Management philosophy
- Advocacy between organisational groups
- Creation of, or active support for, a vision for the organisation with engrained project management processes
- Removal of barriers to change
- Assurance of funding for the implementation and continued operation of the PMO
- Enthusiasm for the use of project management information and involvement in the processes

It's important that the support should be actionable at a working level. For instance, providing some high level design principles but not insisting on detailed design approval. Or, issuing a public announcement which would then be followed up by detailed posts about specific topics from the team.

This paper describes a sponsor's role in developing project management maturity.
The Executive Sponsor - the Hinge upon which Organisational Project Management Maturity Turns?

Talking to Sponsors

A common question asked of a consultant is 'what do other organisations do?'. The accurate answer - 'it all depends...' - isn't enough. It's useful to have a framework for helping the client organisation to understand why context is so important. It also helps your engagement with the organisation by helping to surface strategic implementation concerns.
Putting the question in terms of Critical Success Factors catches the attention and starts the conversation about what do we have to do to be successful. Over the next few posts, we're going to have a look at a number of CSFs. In particular at:
- Methodology and Processes
- Project Management Expertise
- Technology Infrastructure
- Cultural Change Management
- Executive Support
It's important to understand that this list is not a menu (pick any two). They are all required to some extent. The extent will vary from organisation to organisation and depends on the level of maturity, the volume of project management activity, the goals of management, the degree of centralisation of the organisation and a host of other factors.