Tuesday, February 19, 2008

M+A Integration Requires Technology Marriage

Here's some perspective on the Microsoft / Yahoo marriage. The integration of their cultures will be daunting. However, blending their technologies is likely to generate the most contention. This could be interesting to watch, if acquisition is consummated. Can the best of both companies survive? ...

... "A smooth integration also will not be a matter of simply swapping one set of software or hardware for another - though that is a daunting part of the task. It may hinge on changing deep-seated mindsets. " ...


Via New York Times: Merger View:

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, February 06, 2008

IT Project Visibility to Wall Street Analysts

Insights on how Wall Street may view an IT project and how to address their concerns. ...

... "Red flags pop up when, for example, management offers analysts vague time lines of when the company expects to start or finish integrating systems in a merger or acquisition ... " ...


Via CIO: Wall Street

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Thursday, November 08, 2007

PMO Success: A Matter of Integration

There's a great article on Projects@Work about Harvard Pilgrim Health Care's (HPHC) PMO, examining the elements that have made it succesful. It's rare you hear about a successful PMO these days, and when you do, it's usually a result of the factors listed here.

Key lessons (all of which I've long endorsed):

1) Look outward to the overall business and the customer, not just IT.

2) Keep it simple. A PMO doesn't have to be complex; it just needs to support project managers, and engage them in continuously improving the overall process.

3) Keep it integrated. An enterprise PMO, outside of IT, is a vital part of ensuring integration. An additional IT PMO is fine, as long as it's integrated with the whole.

This is in line with my statements that a PMO should really be called an IMO (Integration Management Office).

Here's an excerpt that explains the way the Enterprise PMO and an IT PMO work together at HPHC :

HPHC has two formal PMOs; one at the enterprise level, the other within the IT Division, managed by outside vendor Perot Systems. The two units have co-existed since 1999 and have no trouble defining their roles and relationships in support of business plan delivery. According to Ron Hill, Perot Systems Client Executive to HPHC, the pathway for success is “born from the teamwork of the EPMO and the IT PMO.” Hill believes the strength of the relationship between the two units is visible through the communication between the EPMO, the IT PMO, and the business users. “Everyone must use the same methodology, vernacular, and project tools to reduce the risk of miscommunication.”
And here's the full article...

http://www.projectsatwork.com/content/Articles/239007.cfm

Labels: , , ,

Saturday, November 03, 2007

Enterprise Architecture Comes to Forefront

David Linthicum, an author and respected expert on integration, shares thoughts on the importance of a well-planned enterprise architecture and leveraging architects to develop a sustainable roadmap. ...

... "If investors hold management accountable for accounting irregularities and missed sales, then lost dollars around the ineffectiveness of IT can't be far behind. Thus, the ability to maintain effective and agile enterprise architecture is indeed a corporate responsibility ... " ...


Via InfoWorld: SOA

Labels: , , , ,

Tuesday, March 20, 2007

Business Project: Extract Value

Healthcare IT project seeks to integrate and standardize operations, while the business is on-the-hook for realizing the value. ...

... "The infrastructure goes live in April with users being migrated shortly after. Then comes the job of extracting value, which Mayo-Smith says is not an IT project but a business project. " ...


Via Computerworld: IT Role in Integrated Healthcare Operations

Labels: , , , ,