Tuesday, September 08, 2009

Who's Responsible if Your Not Accountable for Your Responsibilities?

Who is ...

ppppppppppp ppppppppppp ppppppppppp ppppppppppp ppppppppppp ppppppppppp ppppppppppp ppppppppppp ppppppppppp ppppppppppp ppppppppppp ppppppppppp ppppppppppp ppppppppppp ppppppppppp ppppppppppp ppppppppppp ppppppppppp ppppppppppp ppppppppppp ppppppppppp ppppppppppp ppppppppppp ppppppppppp ppppppppppp ppppppppppp ppppppppppp ppppppppppp ppppppppppp ppppppppppp

... responsible if your not accountable for your responsibility to yourself to discover your strengths? President Obama challenges our students to grasp that responsibility. Or, is it that accountability? Here's wishing that our students seize that opportunity to write their own destiny. ...

... "Every single one of you has something you’re good at. Every single one of you has something to offer. And you have a responsibility to yourself to discover what that is. That’s the opportunity an education can provide. " ...


Via The WhiteHouse : School Remarks

Labels: , , , ,

Friday, May 22, 2009

Project Managers Seek Points of View through Collaboration to Gain Strength

In a challenging phase of your project? Not sure what scenario will play out? Feel the weight on your shoulders as project manager? Hold steady on the tiller. And, open up and collaborate, per Bernanke, to educate yourself and your team on the opposing points of view. ...

Fed Chairman Bernanke

... "Bernanke argued that a spirit of open-mindedness and intellectual modesty has driven his response to the financial crisis. " ...


Via Washingtonpost: Emerge Stronger

BC Commencement Address.

Labels: , , , ,

Thursday, October 11, 2007

Managing Your Weaknesses: Don't Ignore Them!

Much has been made of the strengths-based management approach, endorsed by Peter Drucker, and popularized by Marcus Buckingham. As this article from Brian Brim in the Gallup Management Journal points out, focusing on your strengths does not mean ignoring your weaknesses.

In the article, he offers sound advice for managing your weaknesses when struggling with a task, including:

- Getting education and training for skills or knowledge that you lack
- Leveraging your natural talents to do the job (or finding your own way to go about it)
- Forming complementary partnerships
- Just giving it your best shot, knowing there are other things you do well
- If the above alternatives don't work, stop doing it or find a new role!

Here's the article. It's well worth reading...

Debunking Strengths Myths #1

Labels: ,

Sunday, May 27, 2007

Leadership Wisdom : Pig Style

I recently came across an excellent leadership blog site called PigWisdom. It's run by Jack Hayhow, author of The Wisdom of the Flying Pig, and it's full of brief little stories and tips that can energize and enlighten any leader.

I noticed one of the chapters in Hayhow's book borrows it's title from the old adage, "Don't try to teach a pig to sing---it wastes your time and annoys the pig."

It's a cute saying, but many leaders try to do just that by having employees work out of their natural area of strength. As gurus from Peter Drucker to Marcus Buckingham have preached, this is not a wise use of our resources. Plus, it annoys the human.

Meanwhile, here's the PigWisdom blog site. Enjoy.

PigWisdom.com

Labels: , , ,

Wednesday, September 06, 2006

Einstein Project Management Tip #7: Focus on Strengths

Marcus Buckingham said it in all three of his books. Peter Drucker said it. Warren Bennis said it. Dennis Littky said it. And Albert Einstein said it.

Specifically, Einstein said:
"Once we accept our limits, we go beyond them."
I think all the great thinkers agree that it's better to focus on strengths (yours and the individuals on your team) than it is to endure the futility of trying to correct weaknesses.

If we accept our limits and those of the people on our team (after all, as Marcus Buckingham points out, people's nature doesn't change all that much), then paradoxically we can rise beyond those limits.

If so many experts agree, then why do organizations persist in trying to develop people's weak areas to make "perfectly rounded people" instead of building on their strengths? If we instead worked around people's weaknesses, either with complementary partners, more fitting assignments, or support systems, we'd see much more productivity. Perhaps Peter Drucker said it best: "Make weaknesses irrelevant."

Labels: , , , , ,