Tuesday, May 06, 2008

Ten Years of Deliberate Practice

Want to hone your craft? Commit to it for ten years of deliberate practice. ...

... "Reinforcing that no-free-lunch finding is vast evidence that even the most accomplished people need around ten years of hard work before becoming world-class, a pattern so well established researchers call it the ten-year rule. " ...


Via Micro Persuasion on Developing Expertise: Practice brings success

Labels: , , , , , ,

Thursday, January 17, 2008

Project Management Career Path

Benchmarks for project manager's career path are discussed. ...







Labels: , , , ,

Monday, January 14, 2008

Next Gen Collaboration Research Supports Global Teams

IBM will invest in research to deliver solutions that enable the global collaboration of virtual project teams. The company sees collaboration, communication and visualization as capabilities to engage the next generation workforce, who are used to these advanced capabilities in their personal pursuits. ...

... "The challenges of globalization are forcing companies to become more nimble, using an increasingly geographically-dispersed and virtual workforce to remain competitive. In the world of software development, this means 24x7 collaboration with specialized teams around the globe to pick up where another left off. " ...


Via IBM: Innovations Support Global Collaboration

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Saturday, June 16, 2007

Talent Perspective on Innovation in Business

Jeffrey Phillips describes a powerful role for the HR function in creating a culture and talent pool for innovation. Is today's human resource function ready for the challenge? ...

... "People dislike uncertainty and are somewhat unwilling to risk their jobs or futures working on items that are new or risky, without the appropriate assurances that the firm needs and requires people to try new things and make mistakes. " ...


Via Innovate on Purpose: Innovation Talent Perspectives

Labels: , , , ,

Wednesday, May 16, 2007

Challenge IT Talent Poaching With Development Strategy

The battle for IT talent rages and is particularly acute in Asia. Consider exciting training programs, career path tracks, and other soft incentives, such as telecommuting to provide some work-life balance. The enterprise that masters talent development is sure to succeed in the future and have fun doing it. ...

... "To provide a continuous supply of IT staff and retain existing IT talent, the company started to establish various initiatives on staff development. " ...


Via MIS: The Asia IT Talent Challenge

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, April 17, 2007

IT Talent: Women Professionals Needed

NYT shares insights on negative trend for women undergraduate computer science majors. This is a trend that we cannot afford. The IT profession needs the capabilities that come naturally to women: communication, simplicity, relationship-building, caring, nurturing, etc. ...

... "there is one area in which their presence relative to men is static or even shrinking: computer science. " ...


Via New York Times: Female Computer Science Gap

Labels: , , , ,

Wednesday, April 04, 2007

Who Should Manage IT Projects?

Who should manage the big projects? Professional project managers and management methods are a step in the right direction. We need to make this happen and embrace this specialization. ...

... "IT professionals should not be allowed to manage these projects. Traditionally, the IT professionals have come up through the ranks ... Leave the task of running one of these huge projects to specialists, just like everything else we do these days. " ...


Via Computerworld: Action

Labels: , , , ,

Thursday, March 01, 2007

IT Talent: Business Career Path

The conventional IT career path ladder has faded away to a zig-zag path across business and IT roles. Careers will be much more exciting and business acumen will be natural. ...

... "What really matters, then, is knowing how to apply technology to improve business performance. " ...


Via Computerworld: Link

Labels: , , , , ,

Sunday, February 25, 2007

Chief Innovation Officer: Get Trained

Attend training on the Chief Innovation Officer role. The Chief Innovation Officer course is targeted to push the frontiers of the field and brings into focus fostering innovation talent, creating portfolio techniques, and enabling business processes necessary to execute innovation projects in support of growth. ...

... "BMG's Chief Innovation Officer seminar is designed specifically for business leaders who are leading the charge for innovation inside their organizations. This 2-day interactive seminar features emerging strategies, tools and techniques from some of the foremost thinkers in innovation today.

Upcoming Seminar Date: 4/30/2007 2 days Denver, CO " ...


Chief Innovation Officer Seminar

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, February 20, 2007

Just the Facts: Evidence-Based Management

I recently read an enlightening book by Jeffrey Pfeffer and Robert I. Sutton, titled, Hard Facts, Dangerous Half-Truths, and Total Nonsense: Profiting from Evidence-Based Management.

The premise of the book is that many organizations follow the guru du jour, or manage according to the book of "someone said so." As the book points out, if we only looked at the evidence, we'd see that may of these so-called truths are anything but.

Here are some examples of the lessons the book has to offer, always supported by evidence:

1) Forced ranking of employees doesn’t work, especially where people’s performance depends on interdependence with others. Furthermore, a survey of over 200 HR professionals by the Novations Group found that forced ranking (employed by more than half of the companies) resulted in lower productivity, injustice, skepticism, less employee engagement, reduced collaboration, lower morale, and mistrust in leadership.

The authors add that, if an organization trains people right and places them in an effective system, there’s no reason why 10 or 20 percent would automatically become incompetent every year.

2) Beware of your biases as a manager. Studies of NBA drafts showed that players picked earlier and paid more were less likely to be traded and had longer careers, regardless of their actual performance.

3) In the war for talent, don't forget that bad systems cause far more damage than bad people. Try redesigning systems and jobs before judging individuals. And don’t give people objectives unless the system and staffing can support it.

4) Watch out for dangerous incentives. One organization's salespeople shipped too far ahead of schedule just to win a prize. Some salespeople would hold customer returns in the trunk of their car so they still get their commission for that period. Others opened bad credit accounts because any order counted as a good order. In another company, incentives to complete truck routes early led to increased accidents and overloading of trucks to avoid multiple trips.

5) Strategy isn’t all it’s cracked up to be. Operational execution often has a greater impact on performance. The CEO of Wells Fargo once said, “I could leave our strategic plan on a plane and it wouldn’t make any difference. No one could execute it.” In U.S. football, virtually every play is designed to go for a touchdown. Unfortunately, reality gets in the way, as do mistakes in execution.

The authors point out that time spent pursuing strategic options could be better spent solving operational problems or focusing on customer needs. Organizations such as eBay and Intel use a “learn as you go” approach, putting something in the market and tweaking accordingly. Doing the right things is important, but not at the expense of doing them effectively.

6) Many changes, including mergers and acquisitions, ERP implementations, Six Sigma programs, Business Process Reengineering, cost cutting initiatives, and others, carry risks that outweigh the benefits and can be easily misapplied. People tend to underestimate the costs and overestimate the gains.

However, if it is determined that the change is still needed, the authors suggest we:

a) Ensure dissatisfaction with the status quo (i.e. the burning platform)
b) Communicate the same message repeatedly about the need for the change
c) Express extreme confidence in the change, but listen to concerns and adjust accordingly
d) Expect setbacks, errors, and miscommunication; Learn from it and revise processes. Never point fingers.

7) Based on proven evidence, in order to gain respect and trust, leaders should:

a) Act "as-if" - Be sure to act and talk like a leader
b) Have some sense of modesty. Understand the difference between knowledge (knowing things) and wisdom (knowing what you know and knowing what you don’t know).
c) Know when to get out of the way.
d) Above all, be an architect of systems, teams, and cultures.

These are but a few of the valuable nuggets in the book. The book offers additional tips as well, plus loads of supporting stories, examples, and research. Perhaps most valuable is the chart on the various types of changes and risks associated with them. I highly recommend this book to all leaders.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Friday, February 16, 2007

Project Controller: The Project Manager's Best Friend

Halleluyah! Finally, there's an article saying what I've been saying for years. With projects becoming more and more complex, and leadership and stakeholder management requiring more attention than project managers have time for, there's a need for another role to manage the "control" aspects of the project.

This article by Robert Wourms on Projects@Work details how organizations such as State Farm have had success doing just that. Bring on the Project Controller. As a member of the leadership team for PMI's new standards for program management and portfolio management, I witnessed first hand how valuable this role was, as it freed the program manager up to actually lead the program.

The article shows how the project controller's role can include tasks such as:

1) Educating the team on processes
2) Facilitating Planning and Control sessions
3) Developing the project schedule
4) Controlling progress
5) Tracking and analyzing costs
6) Managing Issues, Risks, and Changes
7) Documenting and delivering status information

So what's left for the project manager to do? Plenty. Supporting this, the article offers a valuable table outlining the role of the project manager vs. the program controller. Read on...

http://www.projectsatwork.com/content/Articles/221443.cfm

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Sunday, December 10, 2006

CIO Focus: Replenish Talent, Plan Succession

Talent drain from the retirement of the baby boomer generation is the perfect storm of our times
With the perfect storm of aging demographics heading toward us, CIO's need to assess their talent, plan for career development of their staff, and create a map for succession. ...

... "Top of the list is the need to address the imminent loss of senior members of IT departments. With many CIOs due to retire in the next few years there will be a huge loss of knowledge and wisdom ... " ...


Via Silicon.com: Link

Labels: , , , ,

Sunday, December 03, 2006

Managing from the Bottom Up

Yesterday I entered a post about Best Buy's new Results-Only Work Environment (ROWE), and how allowing employees total freedom as to where and how they work, focusing instead on results, has shown a 35% productivity improvement. Granted, this may not apply in every environment, but the premise of focusing on results over rules is sound.

What I failed to mention is that this initiative didn't come from the top. In fact, CEO Brad Anderson didn't even know about it untill it was well under way and showing tangible benefits. And that's just the way he likes it.

Kudos to Anderson for allowing the flexibility in his organization for innovation from within, and the courage to try new things. That is what a learning organization is all about.

Anyone who ever brought about major transformation (think Martin Luther King, Ghandi, Jesus), usually did it in a bottom-up approach, not by first convincing "management."

One other thing I failed to mention. While it's uncertain to what extent it played in encouraging this particular situation, a primary consultant to the Best Buy organization is Marcus Buckingham, the talent management guru and author of three of the most enlightening management books I've read (First Break All the Rules, Now Discover Your Strengths, and The One Thing You Need to Know). I'd venture to say that his influence has at least indirectly encouraged this people-focused mentality.

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, November 22, 2006

Managing the Grey Areas: Lessons from the Leadership Quadrant Seminar

On November 15th and 16th, I conducted a seminar with productivity consultant Jerome Jewell called The Leadership Quadrant: 4 Ps for Organizational Excellence. The 4 Ps are Principles, People, Productivity, and Process. It was held at the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia, and we incorporated the museum’s rousing multi-media show, Freedom Rising, into the seminar.

The seminar participants came from the healthcare, criminal intelligence, and manufacturing sectors, which led to some fascinating discussion and dynamics. With any seminar, the value to all in attendance is magnified by the contributions of the participants, and this was no exception.

In the seminar, which included sections on principles, emotional intelligence, systemic thinking, talent management, innovation, project management, and more, the collective group highlighted a number of “grey areas” that a manager must frequently weigh when making decisions.

Some questions arose, such as:

"What if someone no longer likes a role they excel at and prefers a role they're poor at?"

"Do people always need to see the big picture?"

"Should one person be expected to serve the role of a manager, leader, and administrator? A strategist and tactician? A generalist?"

"How do you strike a balance between effective time management and remaining available to your staff?"

"Are recurring meetings effective or are they time wasters?"

In line with these questions, below are some of the factors that managers must consider:

  • People’s individual needs vs. organizational goals
  • Big picture inclusiveness vs. security (or the desire to give people narrow focus)
  • Using generalists vs. specialists (and where the specialty should focus – on a functional area or on a particular skill)
  • Effective time management vs. flexibility and being available to your staff’s needs
  • Recurring meetings vs. consideration for people’s time
  • Informing vs. influencing (for deciding whether to email or meet; even then, the decision is not always straightforward)
  • Innovation vs. execution (knowing when to move from ideation to “getting things done”)
  • Systemic (whole view) thinking vs. systematic thinking (routine, repeatable process)
  • Vigilance vs. delegation (how much is safe to delegate, and to whom?)
  • Firm principles vs. ethical dilemmas (should a firm principle ever be bypassed?)

In all of these cases, the group determined that the answer isn’t always black and white, and that each situation requires weighing these items. The trick is to observe, orient, decide and act quickly (referencing Colonel John Boyd’s OODA principle).

On the item of firm principles vs. ethical dilemmas, the group applied lessons from various cases throughout history where the US Constitution was challenged. It was obvious that there was no “one size fits all” answer.

With more recent events, consider OJ Simpson’s book. If you manage a bookstore with a principle of defending freedom of speech, do you carry O.J. Simpson’s new book, even though it is "ethically challenged," to say the least? Most large-chain bookstores creatively tried to satisfy both sides of the equation by donating all of the proceeds to the victims’ families. Of course, in the end, the book was canceled, but for a while, this was a real challenge to bookstores.

All of this reaffirms that management is abstract, not concrete. Managers cannot have all the answers; but they can and must insure that the right questions are considered, and they must have the courage to make decisions.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, October 10, 2006

Talent Management Software: Edge Goes To ...

Interesting faceoff in the Human Resource software space ... with the predicted war for talent on the horizon, Oracle gains an edge in the competition with SAP. ...

... "During the general session titled, Clash of the Titans: The Second Annual Oracle & SAP Shootout, both Oracle and SAP were tasked with demonstrating how their respective HCM offerings help companies solve three typical HR problems written by Co-Chair Kutik. Leveraging a live demonstration of Oracle's PeopleSoft Enterprise HCM, Oracle scored ahead of SAP in two out of three segments, winning the Manager Empowerment and Workforce Planning/Talent Management problems. SAP won the problem on Reducing Healthcare Costs by using partner software from VitalSpring Technologies. " ...

Via Oracle: Oracle Beats SAP in Human Resources Software Shootout

Labels: , ,

Wednesday, October 04, 2006

Unconsulting: Common Sense Lessons for Project Managers

At someone's recommendation, I just finished reading Unconsulting, by David Newman. Fascinating and energizing book for anyone in business.

His book is partly inspired by Peter Drucker's statement, "Only marketing and innovation produce revenue. All other business functions produce costs." To this end, Newman offers that "the bottom line is meaningless if the top line is weak." He points out that, according to studies, "Companies with the same earnings per share that got there from SALES were worth about 30% more than companies who got there with COST CUTTING."

Newman, who, according to the book's back cover, has been called "a younger version of Tom Peters with less hair," offers 95 common-sense "in your face" tips.

A few more key points, paraphrased from the book:

  • When consulting, talk to people (especially the impact points such as customers, suppliers, etc.) to gain anecdotal data to gain texture, context, and perspective.
  • 95 percent of problems can be addressed by making significant changes to 5 percent of the processes, people, or technology.
  • Simplicity defined: Find the shortest way to the best answer.
  • Be with the client, not of the client. Rock the boat. You're there preceisely for that reason and to give advice. You're there to do your thing for them, not be a "yes" man (or woman).
  • There is no cookie-cutter. Don't sell canned solutions. Listen to the client and look at unique angles to each engagement.
  • Bill Cosby says, "I don't know the key to success, but the key to failure is trying to please everybody."
  • Don't isolate talent management and organizational development to one department. Institutionalize it in all your management.
  • The unconsultant handles an engagement in this way:

    "I'll ask some questions, do some research, guide the discussion, help set clear and specific objectives for the work, offer options, tools and answers each step of the way, and then we'll do the work together."

    All in all, very refreshing stuff. And a good model for project managers as well. I highly recommend this book. It's not available on Amazon.com, only on Newman's site, but well worth getting. Also, see the wealth of free white papers on his site, as well as his blog...

    David Newman: Professional Speaker Motivational Speaker and Keynote Speaker and Business Consultant

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Monday, September 25, 2006

Talent Management: Readiness Survey Results ...

Interesting results of recent talent survey ...

Knowledge Infusion performed the 2010 Talent Readiness Survey in the early summer of 2006 to understand the talent gap to be left by retiring Baby Boomers. The study evaluates when people will leave the workforce, if there will be talent shortages that impact business outcomes, the steps organzations can take to find, develop, and retain the critical skills required for success. ...

The survey validates these findings:

Larger organizations are likely to impacted the most by the retiring workforce.

By 2010, a significant portion of the eligible workforce will retire.

To get ready: You must understand the impact on your organization. What percentage of your workforce could retire in four years? If succession planning at your company is focused more on the executive ranks, now is the time to apply succession modeling to your critical skills. Take a skills inventory. Understand the skills across the workforce demographics. Develop a plan to attract and retain the critical skills for your organization.

And, of course, digitizing your talent data enables your organization to provide visibility to this critical workforce information. Cornerstone OnDemand provides integrated on-demand solutions for talent management.

Via Cornerstone OnDemand : Managing Talent in the Face of Workforce Retirement ...

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, August 22, 2006

Talent Strategy: Workplace Flexibility ...

Article discusses forms of workplace flexibility that range from flexible working hours to career flexibility, such as sabbaticals or special assignments, which when implemented well can be a significant boost to an organization's talent managment business strategy. ...

... "Workplace flexibility is no longer just an employee accommodation; it is a key management strategy that can positively affect employee performance and can improve an organization's financial performance. " ...

Via CCH: Workplace flexibility is more than just an accommodation; it’s a business strategy

Labels: , , , ,

Wednesday, August 02, 2006

Talent and Project Management

I received the latest PM Network magazine from PMI the other day, and several things jumped out at me, especially following my last blog post on the winds of project management changing.

First, Neal Whitten had a great article about how a project analyst (what I've often called a "project control specialist") can be a valuable aid to a project manager by taking on the responsibilities of: project tools management, plan development, sub-plan collection, project support, supporting project tracking meetings, filling in for the project manager at times, and other areas that can free a project manager up to actually lead the project.

It got me thinking about the talents needed for the project manager role, the project analyst/specialist role, and any other roles needed on the project. But more than that, it got me thinking about talent management in general, and what it means to the project management industry.

Just look at these headlines, all from this month's issue:
  • Attracting--and Keeping--top talent
  • Executive Identity: Project managers should learn to think like executives
  • A People Person: Succeeding in project management---and getting what you need from thise around you---requires a well-honed set of people skills
  • Virtual Reality: Dispersed project teams are sparking shifts in management and leadership styles

Clearly, the talents needed to manage projects go way beyond schedule, budget, and cost control. Notice I said "talents" as opposed to skills or knowledge. As Marcus Buckingham points out in his excellent book, First Break All the Rules, there is a huge difference between skills, knowledge, and talent. The first two can be taught. The last one--talent--is innate, and cannot be taught.

This becomes clear when you apply Buckingham's definition of talent as "ANY recurring patterns of behavior that can be productively applied." Everyone has talent. It's just a matter of discovering it and matching them to the right role. The key point is that a person's nature cannot change that much, so it's important to select someone with the right talents (i.e. innate traits). Once that's done, you need to set clear expectations, motivate the person (through praise and recognition of their strengths), and ultimately develop the person (building on the strengths that already exist instead of fruitlessly trying to fix weaknesses).

So what does this mean to the project management field? Everything. It means we need to begin thinking about these innate talents when we hire and assign project managers, when we staff the project, and when we consider how to motivate the team. The talents needed for each role will be different. And, based on the nature of the project and the stakeholders involved, the talent required to manage each project may be different. There is no "one size fits all" when it comes to talent selection.

It's not that skills and knowledge aren't important, but these two items without the correct talents will not bring about success.

What I like about Buckingham's book is that it's based on facts---years of research with the Gallup organization. Anyone who selects and manages people should read this book. And when you do, think about the diverse talents needed for each person on your team, and for the project manager role for each individual project.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Monday, June 05, 2006

IT Project Missing Ingredient: Professionalism?

Project management accreditation ...  right next move?
UK computing leader sees genuine professionalism as key ingredient for transforming IT project success rates. This is a good thing, if interpreted as developing our talent in the industry. Is industry accreditation the answer? It should not be a substitute for creating leadership in achievement in an enterprise, where an environment of continuous improvement supports learning from lessons, improving processes, and expanding the knowledge of project management practitioners. ...

... "It would make my day if somebody brought me a failed IT project that had failed for novel reasons. Of course, nobody ever did, because his contention is that we understand why IT projects fail, and we keep making the same mistakes. " ...

Why IT must get more professional: Via ZDNet Asia ...

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Saturday, February 04, 2006

Mining for Talent; Fielding a Good Project Team

Tom Peters has been blogging about a book by Dennis Littky called The Big Picture: Education is Everyone's Business. Now I can see why. I purchased the book and it's revolutionary. Littky is a pioneer in the education industry and has achieved startling results with his focus on students as individuals. But the book isn't just for those in education, it's for anyone in a leadership role.

Much like the theme of How Full is Your Bucket, the subject of my previous post, it focuses on finding the hidden talents in the individual, and not just basing decisions on grades, scores, or averages. I'm still reading it, so I'm sure I'll be posting more on it in the near future, but so far it's a very enlightening book, and makes so much sense it's scary.

I've always subscribed to this philosophy, as I feel that fielding a good team in business is no different than fielding a good team in sports. You need to find people's desires and areas of talent (nearly everyone has some), encourage them to build on that talent, and put them in the right positions to exercise that talent. Combined with positive reinforcement (which elevates their self-confidence), they will shine as individuals, and if well-matched with others (team dynamics), the team will shine as well.

I recently saw yet another source that supports this theme of "mining for talents." I just subscribed to Leadership Excellence magazine (and in fact have been asked to submit an article to them, which will most likely appear in their April issue). On their website, I saw this quote from leadership guru Warren Bennis...

“It became clear to me that to understand Drucker’s philosophy of management, you need to know his philosophy of education. In fact, they are one and the same: Honor individual differences. Take people as they are. Don’t attempt to change or manipulate them to be like or to become somebody else. There is no one right way. Organizations are as much learning environments as they are socially useful institutions established to produce goods. At their best, they make available sufficient roles where individual strengths can contribute to productivity and where individual weaknesses are irrelevant. There is virtually no such thing as an ineffective worker, only a worker whose areas of competence are inappropriate for a particular role.”

—Warren Bennis, consultant,
Leadership Excellence, January 2006

Very inspiring words.

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Sunday, December 11, 2005

Information Technology Profession: Understand the Skill Shifts

IT leaders value business, functional, and project management skills, but are not investing in the entry level programming skills in the U.S., where early talent is developed. Christopher Koch, CIO, challenges the recent data that the IT workforce has regained its Y2K size and everything is just peachy. Further review of the data shows major structural shifts in skills and jobs have occurred. ...

... "In a survey of 82 companies that began earlier this year and is continuing, the Society of Information Management's team of academic researchers asked which skills IT leaders thought were most important to keep in house today. The top skills were all related to business process or project management. " ...

Information Technology Profession: Understand the Skill Shifts: The Structural Shift in IT - Koch's IT Strategy - Blog - CIO

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,